Disney's decision to turn down a proposed Tomorrowland makeover for Disneyland has sparked curiosity and debate among fans. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, Disney accountants and executives deemed the project financially unviable, citing a lack of expected return on investment. This move has left many wondering what could have been, especially considering the history of Tomorrowland's transformations over the years.
The history of Tomorrowland's makeovers is a fascinating one. From the debut of the 'New Tomorrowland' in 1967, which introduced iconic attractions like the Carousel of Progress and Adventure Thru Inner Space, to the 'New New Tomorrowland' in 1998, which brought Honey, I Shrunk the Audience and Innoventions, the land has undergone several changes. Fans were particularly excited about the prospect of a 'New New New Tomorrowland' in 2019, when concept art and the removal of the 'French Fry Rocks' hinted at a fresh new look.
However, the proposed $600 million multi-year reimagining never materialized. This has left some wondering if the project was too ambitious or if there were other factors at play. The report by the Wall Street Journal suggests that Disney's theme parks executives were concerned about Imagineering's ability to deliver the project on time and within budget, leading to a more cautious approach to spending.
This decision has also raised questions about the future of Disneyland's Tomorrowland. With empty or idle attractions dotting the land, including Innoventions/Star Wars Launch Bay, People Mover/Rocket Rods, Tomorrowland Theater, and Starcade, some are wondering if there is a need for a more comprehensive overhaul. Others are curious about the potential for new attractions, like the extensive upgrades to the Buzz Lightyear rides at Disneyland Paris, Tokyo Disneyland, and Magic Kingdom.
The controversy surrounding this decision has sparked discussion and debate among fans. Some are disappointed that the proposed makeover never came to fruition, while others are curious about the financial considerations that led to the decision. The question remains: what could have been achieved with a more ambitious project, and will Disneyland's Tomorrowland ever look the same again?